Related Posts with Thumbnails
Showing posts with label Communication. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Communication. Show all posts

Saturday, November 23, 2013

Thought for the day: Don't worry about your competition

Chapter Six:  Don't Worry about Your Competition (Let Them Worry about You)
 in  Professional Services Marketing: How the Best Firms Build Premier Brands, Thriving Lead Generation Engines, and Cultures of Business Development Success by Mike Schultz

Topics from Chapter 6 (pp. 69-77) "...  These mistakes are understandable, but they're still mistakes...."
  • Mistake 1: Over-the-Top Competitive Research
  • Mistake 2: Market and Service Offering Reluctance
  • Mistake 3: Clichéd Competitive Differentiation
  • Mistake 4: Unique Methodology
  • Forget General Marketing Advice
  • Don't Worry about Crowded Markets
  • Change the Question from Competition to Clients
  • When Competition Is the Order of the Day
 

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Sharing Tacit Knowledge: A Case Study in the Australian Film Industry


Tacit Knowledge
“Explicit” or codified knowledge refers to knowledge that is transmittable in formal, systematic language. On the other hand, “tacit” knowledge has a personal quality, which makes it hard to formalize and communicate. Tacit knowledge is deeply rooted in action, commitment, and involvement in a specific context (Nonaka, 1994, p. 16)
Irit Alony and Greg Whymark, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia and Michael Jones, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia Informing Science Journal Volume 10, 2007
Abstract:
This paper explores tacit knowledge sharing. This case demonstrates the significance of knowledge sharing to organizational performance, by exploring the contribution of tacit knowledge sharing to the success of projects in the Australian Film Industry (AFI). The differences between knowledge sharing, collaboration and communication, and their interrelations are addressed. We also explore the concepts of knowledge, information, and data. In the interchanges reported here the knowledge shared is almost entirely tacit, and the “raw” data and information do not exist without the context that makes them knowledge. The paper includes the identification of many factors affecting knowledge sharing, not all of which have been identified by previous researchers.

This research contributes to a better understanding of tacit knowledge and how that knowledge is shared. This in turn contributes to a better understanding of how knowledge management can be supported in a modern organization, where often the technology is used in ways not well understood by system managers and software developers. A better understanding can lead to better ICT design and support of knowledge sharing both within and across organizations.
Keywords: Knowledge Sharing, Film Industry, Tacit Knowledge, Qualitative, Collaboration.
See also on the same shelf:

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Knowledge Management of Local / Indigenous Traditions for a Globalized World





The books in the above slide, and following resources may give some sources for reflection on what works and where it works:




From the Handbook for Culturally-Responsive Science curriculum by Sidney Stephens, 2000. Available from the Alaska Native Knowledge Network.

  • Seeking Future Alaska Native PhDs!
    by Ray Barnhardt and Oscar Kawagley
  • Compensating forest-dwelling communities for drug the work of the Healing Forest Conservancy, by K. Moran
  • Infancy of Tools in the Identification of Native Knowledge, by
    Dr. Lalitha Aswath & Rupesh Kumar A.
    full article

  • Resources - Links: Local or Indigenous Knowledge @ Profit From The Application Of New Knowledge Pattern Recognition Research To Your Business: The Kaieteur Institute For Knowledge Management.

  • Focal Area: Status of Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices
  • Knowledge Management and Indigenous Knowledge: MS Word file Information and Communication Technologies, Knowledge Management and Indigenous Knowledge: Implications to Livelihood of Communities in Ethiopia, by Lishan Adam, PhD, ICT in Development Researcher, Lishan@ictfd.net
  • Indigenous knowledge, the library and information service sector, and protocols. Publication Date: 01-JUN-05, Australian Academic & Research Libraries,
    Author: Nakata, Martin ; Byrne, Alex ; Nakata, Vicky ; Gardiner, Gabrielle
  • AUSTRALIAN INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE AND LIBRARIES PDF file

    See on the same shelf:
  • Vertical and tacit: Multifaith and Knowledge Management in Perspective
  • Knowledge Management Applications in Multifaith & / or Multicultural Transactions Revisited
  • Tuesday, January 08, 2008

    The Tacit Knowledge of Team Leadership

    Posted by Sam Marshall @ Intellectual Capital Punishment

    Don't let the title of
    Towards an Ecological Theory of Sustainable Knowledge Networks by Jeff Conklin, et al put you off. Its full of insight about project teams (rather than knowledge networks in general). One thing caught my eye:

    "The process of team formation is complex. Leaders have tacit knowledge about how to move a team through a process, and they access that knowledge in face to face meetings. When in virtual collaborations, they don't have that, e.g. they may not recognize that they don't have alignment about team goals"

    Note that the barrier isn’t lack of knowledge, but the absence of the stimulus needed to retrieve it. The dynamic of the face-to-face interaction is what triggers the intuitive manager to take the right course. He may only sense subliminally the lack of alignment, but he'll intuitively do what it takes to correct that. Few managers would explicitly have a process with a "check alignment" gate, but they all know it must be done. Even bumping into a team member and subsequent chit chat can lead to an explicit awareness that they need information you hadn't thought to pass on. continue reading

    Saturday, October 20, 2007

    Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder

    "Human beings are information omnivores: we are constantly collecting, labeling, and organizing data. But today, the shift from the physical to the digital is mixing, burning, and ripping our lives apart. In the past, everything had its one place--the physical world demanded it--but now everything has its places: multiple categories, multiple shelves. Simply put, everything is suddenly miscellaneous."

    "In Everything Is Miscellaneous, David Weinberger charts the new principles of digital order that are remaking business, education, politics, science, and culture. In his rollicking tour of the rise of the miscellaneous, he examines why the Dewey decimal system is stretched to the breaking point, how Rand McNally decides what information not to include in a physical map (and why Google Earth is winning that battle), how Staples stores emulate online shopping to increase sales, why your children's teachers will stop having them memorize facts, and how the shift to digital music stands..." continue reading

    Monday, October 01, 2007

    Knowledge Audit: Is it Necessary for Your Organization?

    Panel Discussion KnowGenesis is a freely available, international, scholarly journal, dedicated to making accessible the results of research across a wide range of information-related disciplines under Technical Communication. KnowGenesis publishes both referred papers and working papers in the fields of technical communication, documentation, information science, information and technology management, information systems and information policy.

    Read the
    Panel Discussion on " Knowledge Audit: Is it Necessary for Your Organization?" Led by Ginu George

    PS. To access the journal online, you'll need your login ID and password.
    For FREE registration, visit the registration page
    (http://www.knowgenesis.net/journal/index.php?
    journal=IJTC&page=user&op=register) or e-mail your registration
    request to editorinchief@knowgenesis.org.

    NB. Panelists: Prof. A. Neelameghan, Dr. L. J. Haravu, Mr. Bhojaraju D Gunjal, Mr. Ginu George, and Dr. Mohamed Taher

    See also:
    If We Can’t Even Describe Knowledge Sharing, How Can We Support It?

    Saturday, September 15, 2007

    Digital divide revisited

  • Which is mightier, the pencil or the cellphone? U of T prof favours old-fashioned note-taking, bans camera phone shots of overheads, blackboards
    Louise Brown, Education Reporter, Sep 14, 2007, Toronto Star
    Forget film festival paparazzi – students' cellphone cameras are the latest photo faux pas. continue reading
  • For this UP village, COW is computer on wheels!
  • Sunday, August 19, 2007

    PRODUCTIVITY: Brainstorming - Ten Guidelines

    10 Guidelines for Effective Brainstorming




    By Randah Taher

    Brainstorming is a powerful tool, if used correctly, but just like any power tool, you must read the manual, follow instructions and use the thing correctly…or you’re wasting time. Randah Taher presents 10 guidelines to optimizing the power of brainstorming. source


    The Ten Commandments (see also the pdf version):
    1. Come prepared. And invite others to do so too.
    2. Invite others to the party.
    3. Think and re-think the real issue.
    4. Record as you go.
    5. Defer judgement.
    6. Become a generator machine.
    7. Force large quotas.
    8. Elaborate and improve.
    9. Enhance visuals.
    10. Threaten yourself.

    What others say about all-of-the-above:
  • @ LifeChurch.tv
  • Enterprise innovation made easy: Jenni Idea Management Software Service
  • Monday, August 13, 2007

    Corporate DNA

    Using Organizational Memory to Improve Poor Decision-making, by Arnold Kransdorff

    Review:
    Management consultant Kransdorff explains how corporations can make better use of their organizational memory and improve their decision-making capabilities. Likening this key component of intellectual capital to an organization's DNA, he contends that the information gained from experience needs to be transmitted from one "generation" to the next--if a company is to avoid repeating costly mistakes. He then outlines a low-cost knowledge capture and retrieval process that can be implemented annually. Annotation ©2006 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)

    Synopsis
    For more than half a century, the developed world has been chasing productivity. It's financed our wealth but that part of output on which our continued prosperity depends - productivity growth - is petering out. The traditional scapegoat has been the dearth of worker skills. But the worker skills base has never been higher! The other explanation is that it is managers who are not giving full value to their employers. The way they're making decisions is conferring virtually no upside potential, which means they're leaving us wide open for experience-poor competitors to step into our experience-rich shoes. Exactly as Japan did in the 1960s and the so-called BRICK countries - Brazil, Russia, India, China (especially China) and Korea - are threatening now. If creeping uncompetitiveness is not to overtake us, where, then, are the next round of productivity gains to come from? Identifying some gaping holes in the way managers are taught to manage, this book outlines both the size of the problem and a solution. Businesses and other organizations, the author says, have to substantially raise the quality of their decision-making. For this to happen, they need to be much better experiential learners. And for experiential learning to take place, companies and other institutions have to better manage their corporate DNA, the institution-specific experiences otherwise known as Organizational Memory. OM, which characterizes any organization's ability to perform, is the single biggest influence on decision-making excellence. It is a factor of production that has already been paid for at great expense, yet is readily discarded in the backwash of the biggest change in workplace practice for more than a century - the actively-encouraged flexible labor market. This book explains why this key component of intellectual capital should be better managed, can be better managed and, particularly, how it can be used to help organizations reduce the pandemic of repeated mistakes, reinvented wheels and other unlearned lessons that litter modern living.

    Tuesday, July 24, 2007

    India to dominate global KPO market - Media Monitoring

    "The ambit of knowledge services typically spans areas like Business Research, Market Research, Investment Research, Data Analytics and intellectual Property." says Bhaswati Chakravorty in New Delhi, Dataquest

  • KPO:
    What is KPO: The work entails doing equity research for overseas investment banks, research houses, consultancies and other financial institutions. The range of services covered by KPO includes intellectual property creation such as patent research, data mining, database creation and updating and analytical services such as equity research, competitive intelligence preparation of company profiles, industry reports and financial modelling. Says, Amitabh Sharma Virtual bridge - The knowledge process outsourcing industry Jamaica Gleaner News, July 11, 2007.

  • India to dominate global KPO market The Times of India, 23 Jul 2007
    NEW DELHI: India, already known as the back office of the world, will account for two-third of the global Knowledge Process Offshoring (KPO) segment that could create up to 1.8 lakh new jobs here by 2011, a new study has said.

    The worldwide KPO market is expected to grow to 16.7 billion dollar in revenues by 2010-2011 at an annual growth rate of 39 per cent. Of this, India would account for 11.2 billion dollars, according to the study by business research and analytics firm Evalueserve continue reading
  • Evalueserve Quarterly Sales Index Survey: What's Holding Back 'Small and Medium Sized Businesses' from Growing? Small Business Informer News, July 12, 2007
  • An In-Depth Analysis of the Indian Vendor Space along with Profiles of All Major Industry Players, July 10 2007 [Company Press Releases]
  • Gurgaon Bheja now Served Fresh in Wall Street, Puneet Mehrotra, Hindustan Times, July 19, 2007
    Extract:

    "Dogs and Indians not allowed"
    Circa 1945, signboard outside the elitist British Club in Calcutta
    "India is the 2nd biggest investor in London"
    Circa 2006, small news snippet in the business page of a leading newspaper.
    "Asathoma Sadhgamaya, Thamasoma Jyothirgamaya"
    The above is a Sanskrit verse from an ancient Hindu text meaning from the unreal lead me to the real, from shadows lead me to the light. The great Indian brain is doing exactly that. Leading the world's largest money market into light. Yes, that absolutely right. Not talking about some mundane back office processing work. The work happening here is pure pundit-giri consisting of analysis and more, about which is a hot stock, where to invest, about mergers and charting the growth of the world's biggest financial market. In simple words brains at Gurgaon, out skirts of Mumbai and Chennai are actually running the Wall Street Market.

    If that sounds like an understatement and too unreal to be real would somebody please answer what are companies like iRevna, Evalueserve, Fidelity, Copal Partners and others doing in India. Surely they can get cheaper labor in Philippines and perhaps many more countries. continue reading Gurgaon Bheja


    PUNCHLINE - No Wonder:

    Taj Mahal on a London visit with Shilpa, Dravid



  • See also on the same shelf and isle Knowledge Management aspects while Outsourcing Business Processes
  • Monday, July 02, 2007

    An Alternative for Search and Knowledge Management

    Dan Ryan, 9/26/2005, Intranet Journal



    "Due to the tremendous amount of content and knowledge nearly every company
    generates, employees often depend on meta data and various search functionality,
    such as full-text search and retrieval, to find desired information across a
    variety of content repositories. This common process for locating relevant
    content throughout enterprise-wide systems relies on some key assumptions that
    may not hold true when users perform information searches.
    These assumptions
    include:
    Users are able to create useful, optimal search terms
    Users know the information they are looking for exists
    Users are able to select appropriate metadata while searching for content
    Search engines organize results in a logical manner that is most beneficial for the user
    The search for content is relevant to the context of the business function being performed by the user.


    An alternative to traditional search and knowledge management capabilities is
    emerging that eliminates the reliance on these assumptions, making the process
    of locating internal information more productive and successful. This
    alternative is "Intranet Views." Continue reading

    Link to the Journal courtesy of: Rajesh Setty @ blog.lifebeyondcode.com

    Wednesday, May 30, 2007

    Two Ideas for Access to Knowledge


    The Infrastructure of Free Expression and Margins of Appreciation by Jack Balkin
    [Address delivered at the Second Access to Knowledge Conference (A2K2), Yale University, April 27, 2007. My address at the first A2K conference discussing the basic theory of Access to Knowledge can be found here.] Continue reading @ Balkinization an unanticipated consequence of Jack M. Balkin

    Saturday, May 26, 2007

    Google to Digitize 8,00,000 Books at Mysore University in India


    Around 8,00,000 books as well as manuscripts from the Mysore University in Karnataka, India will soon be digitized by Google.

    The Mysore University library has around 100,000 manuscripts that are written both on paper as well as palm leaves. These would include India’s first political treatise, the ‘Arthashastra’ written in the 4th century BC by Kautilya. Continue reading

    [PS. Above info courtesy: David P. Dillard & Soundara Rajan]

    PUNCHLINE:
    "Publishing industry via a battle between technology that is predisposed to liberate information and business models that seek to lock information down. For better or worse, the future of innovation and ideas is being defined by the entertainment/publishing industry via a battle between technology that is predisposed to liberate information and business models that seek to lock information down." James L. Hilton, in Copyright Myths and Realities [see the first link below for full details]

  • When Worlds Collide: Copyright and Scholarship in the Digital Age James L. Hilton;
  • Double Fold: Libraries and the Assault on Paper, Nicholson Baker


  • Vandals in the Stacks?: A Response to Nicholson Baker's Assault on Libraries (Contributions in Librarianship and Information Science), by Richard J. Cox
  • Are Poor Countries Losing the Information Revolution, Francisco Rodríguez. Ernest J. Wilson,
  • It's a steal: who owns what in the digital age
  • Google Books: Whats Not to Like?

    See also Mysore University related posts:
  • Prof. Shalini R Urs's Contributions to Digital Librariansip
  • Dr. N B Pangannaya: Life and times
  • Mysore Univesity Library School Alumni
  • Saturday, May 19, 2007

    Body-Mind-Soul - KM initiatives




    See also:

  • KM and Internal Communications based on Nirmala Palaniappan's @ Aa..ha! [Thinking Inside The Blog!]
  • Knowledge Management @ Multifaith Information Gateway


  • Saturday, May 12, 2007

    Knowledge Management, Reference Service, and Web 2.0 Tools

    PS. If the youtube link is not active, click here: Web 2.0 with Eric Feola: Why Wikipedia Sucks

    Riccardo Ridi's REFERENCE SERVICE
    There is a growing connection between Knowledge Management (KM), Reference Service (RS) and Web 2.0 tools, such as, Wiki. I found a very interesting article by Angela Kille "Wikis in the Workplace: How Wikis Can Help Manage Knowledge in Library Reference Services."
    And the cited sources help in understanding this nexus:

  • Clyde, L. A. (2005). Wikis. Teacher Librarian, 32(4), 54‑56. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from Library Literature & Information Science database.

  • Cohen, S. M. (2005). Wiki while you work. Public Libraries, 44(4), 208‑209. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from Library Literature & Information Science database.

  • Comparison of wiki software. (2005). In Wikipedia. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software

  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School.

  • Fichter, D. (2005a, July/August). The many forms of e‑collaboration: Blogs, wikis, portals, groupware, discussion boards, and instant messaging. Online, 29(4), 48‑50. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from Library Literature & Information Science database.

  • Fichter, D. (2005b, September/October). Intranets, wikis, blikis, and collaborative working. Online, 29(5), 47‑50. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from Library Literature & Information Science database.

  • Frumkin, J. (2005). The wiki and the digital library. OCLC Systems & Services, 21(1), 18‑22. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from Emerald Insight database.

  • Gandhi, S. (2004). Knowledge management and reference services. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(5), 368‑381. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from ScienceDirect database. [editor, abstract fulltext]

  • Gunnlaugsdottir, J. (2003). Seek and you will find, share and you will benefit: Organising knowledge using groupware systems. International Journal of Information Management, 23(5), 363-380. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from ScienceDirect database.

  • Jantz, R. (2001). Knowledge management in academic libraries: Special tools and processes to support information professionals. Reference Services Review, 29(1), 33‑39. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from Emerald Insight database.

  • Leuf, B., & Cunningham, W. (2001). The wiki way: Quick collaboration on the Web. Boston: Addison‑Wesley.

  • Prusak, L. (2001). Where did knowledge management come from? IBM Systems Journal, 40(4). Retrieved October 25, 2005, from http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/404/prusak.html

  • Stover, M. (2004). Making tacit knowledge explicit: The ready reference database as codified knowledge. Reference Services Review, 32(2), 164‑173. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from Emerald Insight database.

  • Tonkin, E. (2005, January). Making the case for a wiki. Ariadne, (42). Retrieved October 25, 2005, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue42/tonkin/

  • Wagner, C. (2004). Wiki: A technology for conversational knowledge management and group collaboration. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 265‑289. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from Business Source Premier database.

  • Wagner, C. (2005). Supporting knowledge management in organizations with conversational technologies: Discussion forums, weblogs, and wikis. Journal of Database Management, 16(2), i‑viii. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from Business & Company Resource Center database.


  • See my related post:
  • Knowledge Capture - Librarians' Role
  • Wikipedia and Academia Hit News Headlines Again
  • Friday, April 27, 2007

    Thought for the day - Three God's gifts with Ram Charan


    "What he does is hard to describe. But the most powerful CEOs love it enough to keep him on the road 24/7 and make him the most influential consultant alive." Fortune's David Whitford reports.
    God's Gifts:

  • "... this human being has a talent to figure out what the consumer really wants"
  • "... he has the will and the talent to find - no matter where it is! - the right technology that will deliver what they want."
  • "... he has the talent to create demand at the right time"
    Extract from: The strange existence of Ram Charan, David Whitford, Fortune writer, April 24 2007 [Info courtesy: Thadakamalla Sujatha]


    Ram Charan speaking:

  • Sunday, April 08, 2007

    PM and KM Culture

    Eclectic Bill talks about a Project Management Case Study that he read on How Culture Affects Knowledge Transfer and quotes some important reasons why there is little knowledge sharing:
    -Masculine values - compete and dominate rather than reflect and build relationships
    -Perception of time as scarce
    -No concern about the past and limited concern about the future
    -Relationships based on respect and no unrequested interference
    -Private ownership of projects
    -Project managers don't need help


    PS. For ages people struggle to understand how the work culture of PM and KM can be or should be integrated. And the above is an excellent telltale.

    Sunday, March 25, 2007

    Quote of the Year 2007


    Jean-François David in Knowledgable? says, Librarians are the historically first "knowledge managers" in organizations. Now, all managers are supposed to be ! Are librarians out? Or any manager is the librarian?*

    *See more on this: We the librarian @ Macehiter Ward-Dutton: Blog on IT-business alignment and related things

    See also:
  • Quote of the Year 2006
  • Monday, March 12, 2007

    Librarian's Interface with Knowledge Management

    Quotable Quote:
    "I think all of [us] as academic librarians, whether we work in administration, collection management, reference, or technical services, must take on new roles as knowledge managers." Joseph J Branin, Director of Libraries at Ohio State, quoted in Knowledge Jolt with Jack

    Interesting readings:

  • A librarian's perspective on knowledge management, 19 Jan 2007 by Jack Vinson
    "The Ohio State University library system has been developing a Knowledge Bank since 2002. Without knowing much about the program, I found the article Knowledge Management in Academic Libraries: Building the Knowledge Bank at the Ohio State University, by Joseph J Branin, Director of Libraries, 2003."
  • Library 2.0 reference, by John Tropea @ Library clips, November 27, 2006
    [includes themes, such as: Common needs for a reference file, Sharing culture, The web 2.0 way, Non web 2.0 reference knowledge bases] Filed under: library, km
  • More on Darlene’s presentation: how do we get there from here?
    @ The Library Rebooted, Library Technologies: Blogs, Wikis, IM & More by Thom on the November 16th, 2006
  • Beyond the OPAC: The Semantic Library @ The Library Rebooted, Library Technologies
  • Knowledge Management in the Workplace: the Librarian as Knowledge Broker
    Thaneerkulam, Chitra, STC NJIT Student Chapter 2005
  • See more via Google

    My similar posts:
  • Nexus between Knowledge Management and Library Science
  • Learning Activities for Virtual Reference
  • Information Literacy (for all) - A useful gateway
  • Visualization - EBSCOhost’s cool new integration of Grokker

    My related posts:
  • Collection Development Templates
  • Pull and Push Communications: Ranganathan's Laws re-interpreted
  • Semantic Web and Facet Analysis
  • Sunday, March 04, 2007

    Question with no answer - few CIOs move to become CEO?

    First a quotable quote: "Librarians are being made CIO's less for our technical skills than for our organizational skills and our ability to manage the complex change that is fostered by or linked to technological change." [Source: Managing Technology, Managing Technologists, Shirley K. Baker]



    An image tells a thousand words, in my humble opinion [image courtesy: blogs.idc.com/ie/].

    "Knowing what we know about CIOs -- that is, that most are smart, hardworking, supremely aware of how the business works and increasingly savvy regarding the working of external customers' minds -- the failure of more CIOs to become CEOs has to be one of the biggest mysteries of our age. If any readers can shed light on it, I'd love to hear what you have to say." Thus spake Thornton A. May, in the Computer World magzine, March 2 2007, p. 10

    Others who reflect on this paradigm:
  • THE CIO'S ROLE IN THE CEO'S AGENDA, By D. Neil Gissler,
    11.11.2004 Cutter Consortium, special to SearchCIO.com
  • Interesting thread at Slashdot, based on a vacuous article about why CIOs don't become CEOs.
  • Why don't CIOs become CEOs? by Espen
  • Google for similar problem of moving up on the ladder.
  • Much more @ Google
  • DESKTOP COMPUTING - Help for Librarians, BY LAUREN CAPOTOSTO [Editorial - CIO]

    Any comments?
  • Labels

    Best Practices (76) Knowledge Management (56) Communities of Practice (50) Information Management (47) Business Intelligence (35) Competitive Intelligence (33) Knowledge Organization (28) Communication (24) Librarians (16) Professional development (15) Library (14) Semantic Web (13) Wiki (11) Education (10) Search Engines (8) Special Library Association (8) knowledge work (8) Google (7) Best Practices; Laws (6) Project Management (6) Tacit (6) blogging (6) career (6) Design (5) Digital Libraries (5) Marketing (5) Oral (5) Internet (4) Leaders (4) Classification (3) Content Management (3) Epistemology (3) Facebook (3) Information Industry (3) Reference (3) Share (3) Society (3) Spirituality (3) Technology (3) Web Analytics (3) Business--Religious aspects (2) Capture (2) Citation Analysis (2) Collection Development (2) Cyber_Worship_Inside (2) Data mining (2) Media monitoring (2) Netizens (2) Religion online (2) Research (2) Resource of the Week (2) Serial Subscription (2) SharePoint (2) Social Networking (2) Social Sciences (2) Visual Search (2) promotion (2) searching (2) Academic Libraries (1) Blog Reviews (1) Cloud (1) Collective Intelligence (1) Copyright (1) CyberWorship (1) Disseminate (1) FAQ (1) Fraud research (1) History (1) Knowledge Centres (1) Knowledge Maps (1) Library Vendors (1) Mapping (1) Online Religion (1) Questions (1) Retrieve (1) Scanner (1) Site vistors (1) Slide show (1) Stock investing (1) Stocks (1) Store (1) Terminology (1) Tools (1) User experience librarian (1) Website visits (1) customer privacy (1) information literacy (1) jobs (1) keywords (1) library resources (1) metadata (1) optical character recognition (OCR) (1) paid content (1) privacy (1) records management (1) web history (1) · Semantics (1)

    PostRank