In recent debates within the KiWi - Knowledge in a Wiki project, the need arose to further refine and find a common understanding of the type of knowledge that is (ideally) managed and processed using (semantic) wikis. One of the proposals evolved around a conceptualization of knowledge put forward by Gabi Reinmann-Rothmeier, also dubbed the “Munich Modell” (Münchner Modell).
In the Munich Modell, knowledge comes in three states of matter: solid (like ice), liquid (like water) and gas (like water vapor).
“Frozen” knowledge is knowledge in its most tangible, manageable form, for instance the type of verified, expert-endorsed information you would find in an encyclopedia like the Encylopedia Britannica.
“Gaseous” knowledge, on the other hand, is knowledge in its least consolidated form: think for instance of the type of heated debate you might have with folks in a pub, which is arguably the least structured, most uncontrollable, but also the most engaging type of knowledge!
And the “liquid” form of knowledge, eventually, is the common knowledge of day-to-day-life. It’s probably fair to say that it becomes obvious mostly when in the process of changing its state of matter: When it is calibrated against “frozen” or informational knowledge or when it is debated, becomes “gaseous” knowledge that informs action. (If you’d like to know more about the Munich model and are able to read German, you might want to download the original article here - PDF, 365 KB). continue reading @ The Semantic Puzzle
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Which flavour does knowledge have on the web?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
Best Practices
(76)
Knowledge Management
(56)
Communities of Practice
(50)
Information Management
(47)
Business Intelligence
(35)
Competitive Intelligence
(33)
Knowledge Organization
(28)
Communication
(24)
Librarians
(16)
Professional development
(15)
Library
(14)
Semantic Web
(13)
Wiki
(11)
Education
(10)
Search Engines
(8)
Special Library Association
(8)
knowledge work
(8)
Google
(7)
Best Practices; Laws
(6)
Project Management
(6)
Tacit
(6)
blogging
(6)
career
(6)
Design
(5)
Digital Libraries
(5)
Marketing
(5)
Oral
(5)
Internet
(4)
Leaders
(4)
Classification
(3)
Content Management
(3)
Epistemology
(3)
Facebook
(3)
Information Industry
(3)
Reference
(3)
Share
(3)
Society
(3)
Spirituality
(3)
Technology
(3)
Web Analytics
(3)
Business--Religious aspects
(2)
Capture
(2)
Citation Analysis
(2)
Collection Development
(2)
Cyber_Worship_Inside
(2)
Data mining
(2)
Media monitoring
(2)
Netizens
(2)
Religion online
(2)
Research
(2)
Resource of the Week
(2)
Serial Subscription
(2)
SharePoint
(2)
Social Networking
(2)
Social Sciences
(2)
Visual Search
(2)
promotion
(2)
searching
(2)
Academic Libraries
(1)
Blog Reviews
(1)
Cloud
(1)
Collective Intelligence
(1)
Copyright
(1)
CyberWorship
(1)
Disseminate
(1)
FAQ
(1)
Fraud research
(1)
History
(1)
Knowledge Centres
(1)
Knowledge Maps
(1)
Library Vendors
(1)
Mapping
(1)
Online Religion
(1)
Questions
(1)
Retrieve
(1)
Scanner
(1)
Site vistors
(1)
Slide show
(1)
Stock investing
(1)
Stocks
(1)
Store
(1)
Terminology
(1)
Tools
(1)
User experience librarian
(1)
Website visits
(1)
customer privacy
(1)
information literacy
(1)
jobs
(1)
keywords
(1)
library resources
(1)
metadata
(1)
optical character recognition (OCR)
(1)
paid content
(1)
privacy
(1)
records management
(1)
web history
(1)
· Semantics
(1)
1 comment:
Hi, this is Jana who wrote that article - I am glad you like it, and am happy if it is something that also librarians can use, not just knowledge managers:-)
Post a Comment